[ad_1]
Premiership-winning coach Phil Gould said the rugby league’s Dally M voting process is “flawed”, but far from the most important issue facing the game.
The voting process for the game’s most prestigious award has been under the microscope in recent weeks, with Half Roosters Luke Keary neglected after his team’s 40-6 victory over the Wests Tigers.
Keary made four tries in what many believed to be a man of the match performance. However, he did not receive a single vote, with Brett Morris, James german and Daine Laurie pick up the 3-2-1.
Tedesco himself was at the center of the controversy in the opening round, receiving just one point in the 46-4 win over Manly, despite three tries and three more.
Morris, who scored three tries in both matches, admitted he was often the beneficiary of either Keary’s or Tedesco’s excellence, calling the system “unfair”.
Speaking on the Wide World of Sports podcast, Six tackles with Gus, Gould said the system was not working.
“I haven’t liked it for 30 years,” he said.
“I have to be brutally honest, I ignore all this because it doesn’t interest me, it never interests me.
“I always saw the Dally M process as flawed, I always felt at different times that it was political, I always thought it was agenda based and biased.
“He didn’t belong to the game. The Immortals were from Rugby League Week, the Dally Ms were from the Daily Mirror and Telegraph newspapers. They were selling tools for media organizations.”
Noting that there was conviction from the individual judges who assigned the votes in each game, Gould said that was not fair.
“I’m not criticizing the people who gave the points, because we all look at the game differently,” he explained.
“We all have different attention spans, we all have different things that we look for in a game. Sometimes I look at him and shake my head.”
Gould said recognition from teammates meant more than receiving three points in the Dally M vote, coming back to a time when players voted for the winner of the game.
“The players are seated in the locker room, and the last player to enter the locker room is the man of the match,” he said.
“Sometimes the players are sitting there like, ‘How did he get it? “
“It’s sometimes a joke among players as to who gets these man of the match awards.”
While Gould and host James Bracey agreed that no system is perfect, the rugby league legend said there was no point in worrying too much about the matter.
“I think you just have to take it for what it is, it’s a promotion for the game, I think it’s a topic of media discussion, it’s popular with the fans, like everything else, he’s going to have his controversial moments, ”he mentioned.
“People won’t agree, but at the end of the year, can we look at it and say, ‘Well, the right guy was the player of the year? “
“Maybe he shouldn’t have been, or maybe he should have, but a week later, whatever?”
“That’s my point of view, it’s just noise in the distance. It’s just another part of the game, it’s not the most important part.”
For a daily dose of the best of the latest news and exclusive content from Wide World of Sports, subscribe to our newsletter in Click here!
[ad_2]
